Cultura e historia

Uriel Bustamante Lozano

doi:10.30854/anf.v2.n3.1994.502

PDF (Español (España))

Published Mar 12, 2018

DOI https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v2.n3.1994.502

Uriel Bustamante Lozano

Universidad Autónoma de Manizales

Abstract

La esencia del hombre como res racional, radica en el desarrollo de sus capacidades potenciales mediante la acumulación de experiencias de las generaciones pasadas. El progreso no significa ni puede significar proceso igual y simultáneo para todos. ¿Cuál es el contenido esencial del progreso atendiendo a la acción histórica? Es el historiador quien aplica a las acciones sus hipótesis de progreso, quien interpreta sus acciones como progreso.

How to Cite

Bustamante Lozano, U. (2018). Cultura e historia. ÁNFORA, 2(3), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v2.n3.1994.502

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

H. G. GADAMER, Verdad y Método, Salamanca, Sígueme 1977, capítulos 2 y 3.

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (1994): January - June

Section

Articles

License

Once the manuscript is approved, the authors should file and sign the Right Transfer Format.

Ánfora

Google Scholar Citation

Citado por

	Total	Desde 2019
Citas	2386	1625
Índice h	23	17
Índice i10	71	54

400

200

100

300

20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320247 7 8 10 9 20 27 37 30 76 91 122 188 231 269 383 332 342 59

Qr

Keywords

Make a Submission

Information

Language

Announcements

Call for Papers: "Global Informalizations and Informalities"

January 15, 2024

New Dossier: "Global Informalizations and Informalities"

Editor: Moisés K. Rojas

Professor of Universidad de Barcelona.

From: January 15th

To: June 15

Neoliberalism operates differently across the regions of the world. One of the
features that reinforces the gaps between the countries of the global North and
South is related to informality. According to the International Labour Organization
(2018), 93% of informal employment is concentrated in developing countries. In
this context, a dossier is proposed that delves into and analyzes informality and the
informalization of labor comparatively, focusing on two aspects.
First, the dossier will underscore the asymmetries that exist in global markets
where Southern countries (mainly Asia and Latin America) have become the
centers of low-cost production. This phenomenon is generated by state projects
and policies that allow as well as encourage the precariousness of local labor in
competition with the global market. Second, it examines the implementation
process, under the influence of international organizations, of precarious economic
models that undermine job security and economic stability. A large group of Latin
American countries have a very weak industrial matrix that has been neglected by
the States, prioritizing precariousness, and primary-export models.
Both processes signify a large- and medium-scale political process to informalize
economies and societies, with global repercussions. There are global economic
and political elites that exercise power over the countries of the South, with the
complicity of local elites, to initiate and strengthen processes of informalization in
economies and employment.
The dossier intends to raise a debate over these terms, with the participation of
researchers from different regions. This would be the political dismissal of
informality from a global perspective. Although the two processes described above
could be the synthesis of the relationship between informality and politics on a
global scale. The dossier is open to explore additional relationships and networks.