Los juicios metacognitivos como tendencia emergente de investigación.
Una revisión conceptual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v30.n54.2023.910Palabras clave:
juicios metacognitivos, calibración, precisión, nivel de confianza, monitoreo metacognitivoResumen
Objetivo: en el presente artículo se tuvo como objetivo realizar una revisión conceptual del constructo ‘juicio metacognitivo’. Metodología: para la revisión temática de la literatura producida por algunos de los autores más relevantes del campo se consideraron 55 fuentes documentales que fueron analizadas mediante las siguientes etapas: introducción, reflexión y establecimiento de conclusiones. Resultados: se establece que los juicios metacognitivos son entendidos como el constructo que agrupa el conjunto de creencias que tienen los estudiantes acerca de lo que saben, y no saben; y también, respecto a cómo controlan y regulan su aprendizaje. Conclusión: el estudio de los juicios metacognitivos se presenta como una alternativa para favorecer el proceso de autorregulación del aprendizaje de los estudiantes a fin de que puedan ser progresivamente más precisos en la calibración de su desempeño.
Descargas
Referencias
Dinsmore, D., L. & Parkinson, M., M. (2013). What are Confidence Judgments Made of ? Students’ Explanations for their Confidence Ratings and what that Means for Calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.06.001
Dunlosky, J. & Thiede, K., W. (2013). Four Cornerstones of Calibration Research: Why Understanding Students’ Judgments can Improve their Achievement. Learning and Instruction, 24, 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.002
Dunslosky, J & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Dunlosky, J., Serra, M., J., Matvey, G. & Rawson, K., A. (2015). Second-Order Judgments About Judgments of Learning. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.132.4.335-346
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and Affect: What can Metacognitive Experiences Tell Us About the Learning Process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
Flavell, J., H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Flavell, J. (2004). Theory of Mind Development: Retrospect and Prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274-290. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2004.0018
Finley, J. R., Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2010). Metacognitive Control of Learning and Remembering. In New Science of Learning: Cognition, Computers and Collaboration in Education (pp. 109-131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_6
Finn, B. & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Overconfidence in Children’s Multi-Trial Judgments of Learning. Learning and Instruction, 32, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.001
Ford, C. L. & Yore, L. D. (2012). Toward Convergence of Critical Thinking, Metacognition and Reflection: Illustrations from Natural and Social Sciences, Teacher Education, and Classroom Practice. En A., Zohar & Y.J., Dori, (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current
Research, Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, (pp. 251-272). Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9726-x.
Gourgey, A. (2002). Metacognition in Basic Skills Instruction. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 17-32). Springer–Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8
Gutierrez, A. (2012). Enhancing the Calibration Accuracy of Adult Learners: A Multifaceted Intervention (tesis doctoral). University of Nevada, Las Vegas. http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgiarticle=2569&context=thesesdissertations
Gutierrez, A., Schraw, G., Kuch, F. & Richmond, A. (2016). A Two-Process Model of Metacognitive Monitoring: Evidence for General Accuracy and Error Factors. Learning and Instruction, 44, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.006
Gutierrez, A., Schraw, G., Kuch, F. & Richmond, A. (2021). General Accuracy and General Error Factors in Metacognitive Monitoring and the Role of Time on Task in Predicting Metacognitive Judgments. Revista de Psicología CES, 21(1), 1-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346408081_General_Accuracy_and_General_Error_
Factors_in_Metacognitive_Monitoring_and_the_Role_of_Time_on_Task_in_Predicting_Metacognitive_Judgments
Gutierrez de Blume, A. P. (2020). Efecto de la instrucción de estrategias cognitivas en la precisión del monitoreo metacognitivo de los alumnos universitarios estadounidenses. Revista Tesis Psicológica, 15(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.37511/tesis.v15n2a12
Hacker, D., Bol, L. & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining Calibration Accuracy in Classroom Contexts: The Effects of Incentives, Reflection, and Explanatory Style. Metacognition Learning, 3, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9021-5
Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J. & Graesser, A., C. (2009). A Growing Sense of “Agency”. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky y A. Graesser (eds.), Handbookof metacognition education (pp. 1-4). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Hacker, D., J., Keener, M., C. & Kircher, J., C. (2009). Writing is Applied Metacognition. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 154-172). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Hadwin, A., F. & Webster, E., A. (2013). Calibration in Goal Setting: Examining the Nature of Judgments of Confidence. Learning and instruction, 24, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.001
Koriat, A. (2000). The Feeling of Knowing: Some Metatheoretical Implications for Consciousness and Control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0433
Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and Consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness (pp. 289-325). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.012
Koriat, A., Nussinson, R., Bless, H. & Shaked, N. (2008). Information-Based and Experience- Based Metacognitive Judgments: Evidence from Subjective Confidence. En J., Dunlosky & R., Bjork (Eds.). Handbook of Metamemory and Memory (pp. 117-136). Psychology Press.
Koriat, A. (2012). The Subjective Confidence in One’s Knowledge and Judgements: Some Metatheoretical Considerations. En M., J., Beran, J.,L. Brandl, J., Perner & J., Proust (Eds), Foundations of Metacognition (pp. 504-555). Oxford University Press.
Maier, J. & Richter, T. (2014). Fostering Multiple Text Comprehension: How Metacognitive Strategies and Motivation Moderate the Text-Belief Consistency Effect. Metacognition and Learning, 9(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9111-x
Misailidi, P. (2010). Children’s Metacognition and Theory of Mind: Bridging the Gap. In A., Efklides & P., Misailidi, (Eds.). Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research (pp. 279–291). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_13
Narens, L., Nelson, T. O., & Scheck, P. (2008). Memory Monitoring and the Delayed JOL Effect. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of Metamemory and Memory (pp. 137-153). Psychology Press.
Nelson, T. (1996). Gamma is a Measure of the Accuracy of Predicting Performance on One Item Relative to Another Item, Not of the Absolute Performance on an Individual Item. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 257–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199606)10:3<257::AID-ACP400>3.0.CO;2-9
Nelson, T,O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00797421(08)60053-5
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When People’s Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect”. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x
Nelson, T.O. & Narens, L. (1994). Why Investigate Metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 1–25). The MIT Press.
Peña-Ayala, A. & Cárdenas, L. (2015). A Conceptual Model of Metacognitive Activity. En A., Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends: A profile of the current state of the art (pp. 39-64). Springer.
Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive Calibration and Extended Conceptualization and Potential Applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9030-4.
Sawyer, R., K. (2014). Introduction: The New Science of Learning. In R., K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1-20). Cambridge University Press.
Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Schraw, G. (2002). Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction (pp. 3- 16). Springer – Science.
Schraw, G. (2009). Measuring Metacognitive Judgment. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 415-429). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Schraw, G., Kuch, F. & Gutierrez, A.P. (2013). Measure for Measure: Calibrating Ten Commonly used Calibration Scores. Learning and Instruction, 24(48-57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.007
Schraw, G., Kuch, F., Gutierrez, A.P. & Richmond (2014). Exploring a Three- Level Model of Calibration Accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology,106(4), 1192–1202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036653.
Schraw, A. & Gutierrez, A. (2015). Metacognitive Strategy Instruction that Highlights the Role of Monitoring and Control Processes. In: A. Peña- Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications and Trends (pp. 3-15). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Schwartz, N. H. & Perfect, T. (2004). Introduction: Toward an Applied Metacognition. En T., J. Perfect & D., S. Lindsay (Eds.), The SAGEHandbook of Applied Metacognition (pp. 3-19). SAGE Publications Inc.
Schwartz, N. H., Scott, B.M. & Holzberger, D. (2013). Metacognition: A Closed-Loop Model of Biased Competition–Evidence from Neuroscience, Cognition, and Instructional Research. En R., Azevedo & V., Aleven, (Eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies (pp. 79-94). Springer International Handbooks of Education.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_6 Scott, B.M. & Schwartz, N.H. (2007). Navigational spatial displays: the role of metacognition as cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 1(17), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.008
Shaw, S., Kuvalja, M., & Suto, I. (2018). An Exploration of Nature and Evaluation of Student Reflection. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment publication, 25, 2-8.
Tobias, S. & Everson, H. T. (1996). Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. College Entrance Examination Board.
Tobias, S. & Everson, H. T. (2002). The Ability to Estimate Knowledge and Performance in College: A Metacognitive Analysis. En H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp.69-84). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8
Tobias, S. & Everson, H., T. (2009). The Importance of Knowing What You Know: A Knowledge Monitoring Framework for Studying Metacognition in Education. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 107-128). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Touroutoglou, A. & Efklides, A. (2010). Cognitive Interruption as an Object of Metacognitive Monitoring: Feeling of Difficulty and Surprise. En A., Efklides & P., Misailidi, (Eds.). Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research (pp. 171-208). Springer Science+Business Media.
Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection Prompts and Tutor Feedback in a Web-Based Learning Environment: Effects on Students Self-Regulated Learning Competence. Computers in Human. Behavior, 20, 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
chb.2003.10.001
Veenman, M., J. (2012). Metacognition in Science Education: Definitions, Constituents, and Their Intricate Relation with Cognition. En A., Zohar & Y.J., Dori, (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research, Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp. 21-36). Springer.
Veenman, M.V.J. (2013). Assessing Metacognitive Skills in Computerized Learning Environments. En R., Azevedo & V., Aleven, (Eds.) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies (pp. 157-168). Springer Science+Business Media.
Vesonder, G. T., & Voss, J. F. (1985). On the Ability to Predict One’s Own Responses While Learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749596X(85)90034-8
Winne, P. H. (2011). A Cognitive and Metacognitive Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning. En B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-32). Routledge.
Winne, P., & Azevedo, R. (2014). Metacognition. In: T. Sawyer. (Ed), The Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 63- 87). Cambridge University Press.
Zohar, A. & Dori, Y., J. (2012). Metacognition in Science Education Trends in Current Research. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research, Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp. 1-20). Springer.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-Regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect. In: D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 299-315). Routledge.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Adriana Julieth Olaya Torres, Aníbal Puente Ferreras, Diana Marcela Montoya Londoño, Antonio Gutierrez de Blume
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Una vez aprobado el manuscrito el/los autores deben firmar el contrato de cesión de derechos patrimoniales sobre el artículo.
