Main Article Content

Jonathan Restrepo Rodas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-1774
Laura Niño Buitrago https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-500X
Carolina Robledo Castro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8494-5305

Abstract

Objective: The study proposes an exploration of dyads (philosophy-cognitive neuroscience) that constitute the basis of interculturality, leading to the postulation of the Elemental Intercultural Imprint as a neurocognitive model that impacts the ontological notion of 'interculturality,' viewed under the naturalizing project. Methodology: An analytical conceptual methodology was implemented, aiming to demonstrate the modes of naturalization of philosophical concepts descriptively and critically. The following hypothesis is maintained: the progressive naturalization of consciousness, self-control, identity, social mind, alterity, and morality can reveal the neurocognitive mechanisms of interculturality in individuals. To this end, the
naturalization of consciousness as attention, identity as self-reference memory, self-control as self-regulation, mind (social) as Theory of Mind, alterity as empathy, and morality as moral cognition are analyzed. Results: The conceptual analysis in the reviewed studies found that partial epistemological transposition and methodological
symmetry are the most common mechanisms of naturalization of the components of interculturality, and that its neurocognitive architecture allows for the incorporation of other components. Conclusions: It is concluded that the proposed neurocognitive basis is indispensable for the empirical study of interculturality.

How to Cite

Restrepo Rodas, J., Niño Buitrago, L., & Robledo Castro, C. (2024). Naturalization of Philosophical Concepts Underlying Interculturality and Proposal of the Neurocognitive Model ’Elemental Intercultural Imprint’. ÁNFORA, 31(57), 270–298. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v31.n57.2024.1096

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

Keywords

naturalization, philosophy, cognitive neurosciences, interculturality, (obtained from the UNESCO thesaurus).

References
Addis, D., & Schacter, D. (2011). The Hippocampus and Imagining the Future: Where Do We Stand? Frontiers, 5, 1-15 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00173

Akin, S. (2018). Langues et identités. Cours d’enseignement à distance. Université de Rouen.

Aristóteles. (1983). Les Premiers Analytiques, trad. J. Tricot. Vrin.

Astington, J. & Baird, J. (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Oxford University.

Audi, R. (1999). Laws of thought. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Cambridge University.

Baars, B. (1989). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University.

Barrett, H.C. (2020). Towards a Cognitive Science of the Human: Cross-Cultural Approaches and Their Urgency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(8), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.007

Baumeister, R., & Monroe, A. (2014). Recent Research on Free Will. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00001-1

Boero, H. (2009). Libertad y acción autocontrolada en Charles S. Peirce. En D. González Ginocchio. (Ed.) «Metafísica y libertad» (pp. 13-20). Cuadernos de Anuario Filosófico. Serie universitaria (214).

Bruner, E. (2018). La evolución del cerebro humano. Bonalletra Alcompas, S.L.

Carmona, S. (2014). Cognición social. En D. Redolar. (Ed.) Neurociencia cognitiva (pp. 693-717). Editorial Médica Panamericana.

Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (2011). Self-Regulation of Action and Affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.) Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications (pp. 3-21). Guilford.

Chalmers, D. (2013). How Can We Construct a Science of Consciousness? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1303, 25-35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24236862/

Chalmers, D. (2017). Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism. In G. Brüntrup., & L. Jaskolla (Eds). Panpsychism: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 19-47). Oxford University.

Chen, G., & Starosta, W. (2000). The Development and Validation of the Intercultural Communication Sensitivity Scale. Human Communication, 3, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/t61546-000

Churchland, P. (2011). Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton University.

Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce ́s Approach to the Self. Suny press.

Dal Maschio, E. (2018). Platón. La vida está en otra parte. Bonalletra Alcompas, S.L.

Damasio, A. Tranel, D. & Damasio, H. (1991). Somatic Markers and the Guidance of Behaviour: Theory and Preliminary Testing. In Levin, Harvey S., Eisenberg, M., Benton, Arthur (Eds.). Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction
(pp. 217–229). Oxford University.

Damasio, A. (2018). The Strange Order of Things. Pantheon Books. Denny, B., Kober, H., Wager, T., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Self- and Other Judgments Reveals a Spatial Gradient for Mentalizing in Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(8), 1742–1752. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00233

Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes our Thoughts. Viking Penguin.

Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, Preconscious, and Subliminal Processing: A Testable Taxonomy. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(5), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

Descartes, R. (2003). Discurso del método; estudio preliminar. Traducción y notas de Bello Reguera, E. Tecnos.

De Saussure, F. (1978). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.

Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. & Rizzolatti G. (1992). Understanding Motor Events: A Neurophysiological Study. Exp Brain Res, 91(1), 176-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230027

Diderot, D. & D’Alembert, J. (2017). Enciclopedia metafísica. Volumen 6. Editora Unestp Digital.

Estany, A. (2022a). Naturalización de la ética y la moral. Revista de Humanidades De Valparaíso, (19), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp293-312

Estany, A. (2022b). Desafíos de la neurociencia a la filosofía. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, (20), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp9-12

Fernández, O. (2015). Levinas y la alteridad: cinco planos. Brocar: Cuadernos de investigación histórica, 39, 423-443. https://publicaciones.unirioja.es/ojs/index.php/brocar/article/view/2902

Ferrús, A. (2018). ¿Qué es la conciencia? Una aproximación desde la neurociencia. Bonalletra Alcompas.

Gazzaniga, M. (1993). The Social Brain. Alianza Editorial, S.A.

Gazzaniga, M., & Mangun, G. (2014). The Cognitive Neurosciences (5th ed.). Boston Review.

Goldberg, E. (2015). El cerebro ejecutivo. Planeta.

Gosselin, L. (2010). Les modalités en français. La validation des représentations. Rodopi, coll. Etudes Chronos.

Graziano, M. (2015). Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford University.

Greene, J., Morelli, S., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L., & Cohen, J. (2008). Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004

Greene, J. (2022). The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul (Spanish Translation). Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, (20), 183–229. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp183-229

Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2008). Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 181–217). The
MIT Press.

Han, S. (2013). Culture and Brain: A New Journal. Culture and Brain, 1, 1–2. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40167-013-0006-0

Han, S. (2017). The Sociocultural Brain. A cultural Neuroscience Approach to Human Nature. Oxford University.

Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2015). A Culture-Behavior-Brain Loop Model of Human Development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.010

Kant, I. (2005). Crítica de la razón pura. Traducción de Pedro Rivas. Taurus, Pensamiento.

Knobe, J. (2005). Theory of Mind and Moral Cognition: Exploring the Connections. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(8), 357-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.011

Knobe, J. & Gendler, Z. (2013). Modals with a Taste of the Deontic. Semantics & Pragmatics, 6, 1-42. https://semprag.org/index.php/sp/article/view/sp.6.1

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.

Levinas, E. (1982). Éthique et infini. Fayard.

Luria, A. (1981). Los lóbulos frontales y la regulación de la actividad mental. Fundamentos de neuropsicología. Universidad de Sao Paulo.

Martone, R. (2022). Les neurones du soi. Cerveau & Psycho, (142), 20-24. https://www.cerveauetpsycho.fr/sd/neurobiologie/les-neurones-du-soi-23550.php

McGeer, V. & Pettit, P. (2002). The Self-Regulating Mind. Language & Communication, 22(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00008-3

Moll, J., Oliveira-Souza, R., Zahn, R., & Grafman, J. (2008). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Emotions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol.3. The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and
Development (pp. 1-17). The MIT Press.

Monasterio, A. (2020). La comunicación bidireccional entre la cognición social y la cognición moral. Thémata, (61), 29-48. https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/themata/article/view/10425

Mucchielli, A. (1999). L’identité. Editions PUF.

Müller, U., Jacques, S., Brocki, K., & Zelazo, P. (2009). The Executive Functions of Language in Preschool Children. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C. &Montero, I. (Eds.) Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation (pp. 53-68). Cambridge University.

Núñez, R., Allen, M., Gao, R., Miller, C., Relaford-Doyle, J., & Semenuks, A. (2019). What Happened to Cognitive Science? Nat Hum Behav, 3, 782–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0626-2

Paxton, J. & Greene, J. (2010). Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 511–527. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01096.x

Peirce, C.S. (1877). «La fijación de la creencia». Traducción de José Vericat. En Charles S. Peirce. El hombre, un signo (El pragmatismo de Peirce), José Vericat (trad., intr. y notas) (pp. 242-257). Crítica.

Peirce, C.S. (1908). Logic. Book I. Analysis of Thought. Ch. I. Common Ground. Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C.S. (1974). La ciencia de la semiótica. Nueva visión.

Peirce, C.S. (1988). Fundamentos de la validez de las leyes de la lógica: otras consecuencias de cuatro incapacidades. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 193-208.

Restrepo, J., Niño, L. & Suárez, M. (2022). Naturalizing Morality. From Alethic to Deontic and Axiological Values: The Case of Tocar, a Colombian Spanish Verb. Revista de Humanidades De Valparaíso, (20), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss20pp77-99

Rivière, A. & Núñez, M. (2001). La mirada mental, desarrollo de las capacidades cognitivas interpersonales. Aique.
Robledo, C. & Ramirez, G. (2023). Desarrollo de las funciones ejecutivas en la niñez en contextos escolares. Universidad del Tolima.

Rodríguez, A. (2018). Naturaleza Biopragmática de la moral. Lenguaje y mente, condiciones necesarias de la institución moral. UAM, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.

Ruiz, P. (2018). Aristóteles. De la potencia al acto. Bonalletra Alcompas, S.L.

Savan, D. (1988). An Introduction to C. S. Peirce's Semiotics. Toronto Semiotic Circle.

Serpell, R. (1993). Interface Between Sociocultural and Psychological Aspects of Cognition. In: E.A. Forman, N. Minick & A. Stone (Eds.) Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural dynamics In children's development (pp. 357-367). Oxford University.

Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. (2014). Empathy and Compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), 875–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054

Stannard, J. (1960). Parmenidean Logic. The Philosophical Review, 69(4), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183487

Stapp, H. (2001). Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer. Springer.

Stendardi, D., Biscotto, F., Bertossi, E., & Ciaramelli, E. (2021). Present and Future Self in Memory: The Role of vmPFC in the Self-Reference Effect. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(12), 1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab071

Tomasello, M. (2007). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. MIT.

Tylor, E. (2018). Primitive Culture. Dover Publications ink.

Vilà, R. (2015). Peirce. Aprender a pensar. RBA Coleccionables S.A.

Van Dijk, T. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge, A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University.

Wallach, W. (2010). Cognitive Models of Moral Decision Making. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01101.x

Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007). The Neural Basis of the Interaction Between Theory of Mind and Moral Judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(20), 8235–8240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701408104

Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2008). The Neural Basis of Belief Encoding and Integration in Moral Judgment. Neuroimage, 40(4), 1912–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.057

Zanghellini, A. (2017). A Conceptual Analysis of Conceptual Analysis in Analytic Jurisprudence. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 30(2), 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2017.21
Section
Reflection Articles
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Once the manuscript is approved, the authors should file and sign the Right Transfer Format.