Cognitive Sciences.

Intercultural Perspective

Authors

  • Antonio Partida Gutierrez de Blume Universidad del Sur de Georgia.
  • Diana Marcela Montoya Londoño Universidad de Caldas Universidad de Manizales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v31.n57.2024.1168

Keywords:

Cognitive sciences, cognition, emotion, culture, rurality, violence, personal experience.

Abstract

In this editorial of the monograph in Cognitive Sciences. Intercultural Perspective, a thematic review is presented, which accounts for the object of study, disciplines that underpin the interdisciplinary field of problems, and some current lines of research emerging in the field of study, among which four lines of work stand out. Firstly, studies linking cognitive or neurocognitive variables to the challenge of social diversity; secondly, studies examining the effect of cognition and neurophysiology on the formation of social stereotypes, gender; as well as on processes of discrimination or social and cultural inclusion; thirdly, works on the relationship between cognition and rurality; and finally, research that, from educational and social spheres, seeks to reconfigure the personal experience of social processes such as violence and territorial uprooting, towards new narratives of personal and social experience, which contribute to the sense of life of the individual and their community, as experiences that, although painful, can contribute to the relationship between memory and history.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Antonio Partida Gutierrez de Blume, Universidad del Sur de Georgia.

    Docente de Universidad del Sur de Georgia.

  • Diana Marcela Montoya Londoño, Universidad de Caldas Universidad de Manizales

    Universidad de Caldas

References

Estany, A. (2013). La filosofía en el marco de las neurociencias. Revista de Neurología, 56(6), 344-348. https://pavlov.psyciencia.com/2013/03/filosofia-neurociencias.pdf

García, J. (1991). Funcionalismo y ciencia cognitiva, lenguaje, pensamiento, modularidad y conexionismo. Entrevista a Henry Fodor. Revista Estudios de Psicología, 45, 5-31.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Entrevista-con-Jerry-A.-Fodor%3A-Funcionalismo-y-y-y-Albea/ca3adfa1693dae10629a6caaaca950f19ded3a36

Gardner, H. (1987). La nueva ciencia de la mente. Paidós.

Medina, N. (2008). La ciencia cognitiva y el estudio de la mente. Revista de investigación en Psicología, 11(1), 183-198. https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/psico/article/view/3890

Proust, J. (2010). Metacognition. Philosophy Compass, 5(11), 989–998.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00340.x

Thagard, P. (2005). Mind. Introduction to Cognitive Science. A Bradford Book The MIT Press.

Thagard, P. (2010). La mente. Introducción a las ciencias cognitivas. Kazt Editores.

Thagard, P. (2012). The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. The MIT Press Cambridge.

Varela, F. (2005). Conocer: Las ciencias cognitivas Tendencias y perspectivas. Cartografía

de las ideas actuales. Gedisa.

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Cognitive Sciences.: Intercultural Perspective. (2024). ÁNFORA, 31(57), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v31.n57.2024.1168
Estadísticas
Resúmenes 279
Archivo 192
PDF 91
HTML 41

Most read articles by the same author(s)