Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Analysis and Definition of Violence

Authors

  • Tania Galaviz-Armenta Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales y Estudios Regionales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v28.n50.2021.656

Keywords:

Violence; Forms of violence; Conceptual analysis; Definitions of violence; Disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches

Abstract

Objective: despite the plentiful academic discussion about violence, forms of violence, actors, effects, among other things, a question emerges almost permanently: what do we talk about when we talk about violence? This article makes a reflection on the definition and analysis of the concept of violence from different disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches in order to answer the question: what is meant by violence? Methodology: some approaches from Anthropology, Political Science, Philosophy, Sociology, Research for Peace, Criminology and Public Health were considered. Results: it was found that most of the research considers violence as an element that delimits social interactions rather than an irrational or instinctive act. And, these studies establish the degree of cultural, symbolic, institutional influences and the normative in its management and reasoning, depending on the perspective of analysis. Conclusion. a review of advantages and disadvantages of the analytical expediency of the transition from the term violence into the expression of violence was concluded. It considers an interdisciplinary approach that not only focuses on physical manifestations, but addresses the multidimensionality of violence and the matter created by different scales of interaction and affectation by making the violence a changeable and complex social phenomenon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arendt, H. (2006). Sobre la violencia. Alianza Editorial.

Benjamin, W. (1995). Para una crítica de la violencia. Editorial Leviatán.

Blair-Trujillo, E. (2009). Aproximación teórica al concepto de violencia: avatares de una definición. Política y cultura, 32, 9-33. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/polcul/n32/n32a2.pdf [Consultado el 18 de octubre de 2014].

Bourdieu, P. (1998). La dominación masculina. Anagrama.

Butler, J. (2006a). Deshacer el género. Paidós.

Butler, J. (2006b). Vida precaria: el poder del duelo y la violencia. Paidós.

De Haan, W. (2008). Violence as an Essentially Contested Concept. En S. Body-Gendrot y P. Spierenburg (Eds.). Violence in Europe. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 27-40). Springer.

Fernández, J. M. (2005). La noción de violencia simbólica en la obra de Pierre Bourdieu: una aproximación crítica. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 18, 7-31. http://www.enlinea.cij.gob.mx/Cursos/Hospitalizacion/pdf/PierreBourdieu.pdf

Gallego-García, G. M. (2003). Sobre el monopolio legítimo de la violencia. Nuevo Foro Penal, 66, 72-121. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3823123.pdf

Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by Peaceful Means. Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. International Peace Research Institute.

Galtung, J. (2000). 40 Conflicts; 40 Perspectives. En J. Galtung y C. G. Jacobsen (Eds.). Searching for Peace. The Road to TRANSCEND (pp. 122-190). Pluto Press.

Galtung, J. (2004). Transcend and Transform. An Introduction to Conflict Work. Pluto Press.

Galtung, J. (2008). The Transcend Approach to Simple Conflicts. En G. D. Paige y J. Evans Pim (Eds.). Global Nonkilling Leadership Fist Forum Proceedings (pp. 273-284). Center for Global Nonviolence, Matsunaga Institute for Peace, University of Hawaii.

Girard, R. (1977). Violence and the Sacred. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Han, B. Ch. (2013). Topología de la violencia. Herder.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Poder. Anthropos.

Luhmann, N. (2006). La Sociedad de la Sociedad. Universidad Iberoamericana, Herder.

Malešević, S. (2010). The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge University Press.

Organización Mundial de la Salud, OMS. (2003). Informe mundial sobre la violencia y la salud. Washington, D. C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Oficina Regional para las Américas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/summary_es.pdf

Salmerón-Castro, F. (2017). La Antropología y el análisis de la violencia. En L. Herrera-Lasso (Ed.). Fenomenología de la violencia: una perspectiva desde México (pp. 50-82). Siglo XXI Editores.

Stanko, E. (2003). Introduction. En E. Stanko (Ed.). The Meanings of Violence (pp. 1-14). Routledge.

Weber, M. (1979). El político y el científico. Alianza Editorial.

Wieviorka, M. (2003). The New Paradigm of Violence. En J. Friedman (Ed.). Globalization, the State and Violence (pp. 107-139). Altamira Press.

Wieviorka, M. (2009). Violence. SAGE Publications.

Žižek, S. (2009). Sobre la violencia. Seis reflexiones marginales. Paidós.

Published

2020-12-18

How to Cite

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Analysis and Definition of Violence. (2020). ÁNFORA, 28(50), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v28.n50.2021.656
Estadísticas
Resúmenes 1378
Archivo 20
HTML 11