Bio-learning Based on Community Experiences in a Rural Territory of Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v31.n57.2024.1083Keywords:
Learning, bio-learning, rural territory, community experiences, learning experiences, bio-community, (obtained from UNESCO and ERIC thesaurus).Abstract
Objective: To base bio-learning on community experiences in a rural territory of Colombia. Methodology: A socio-critical paradigm, qualitative approach, and Critical Participatory Action Research (CPAR) method. Instruments were a sociodemographic survey, focal groups, semi-structured individual interviews and learning experiences. The instruments were supported by the sociodemographic sheet, focal groups, and
interview scripts, planning of learning experiences, and observation sheets. The work
unit was 51 community families, six teachers, 29 students, six community-linked external agents and one research professor for a total of 195 participants. Results: In Cycle I Problematization, the disconnection of the school from the community was recognized due to the lack of recognition of ancestral local knowledge from the
culture, customs, and traditions of the community. Cycle II Communitization was implemented to enable the solution of those problems. It was based on three learning experiences related to coffee as the main product of the rural territory. As a result, community-related processes such as the construction of peasant and school knowledge supported by processes of community bio-earning were found to provide an ideographic vision of communitization. The community is constructed in a shared pedagogical environment in which bio-community learners interact as part of a bio-learning community to solve the needs ofcommunitization and project bio-learning. Conclusions: Customs have not passed from generation to generation; neither daily life activities nor the value of bio-learning are being exploited. The learning spaces can be found in everyday life, in nature, or in the rural territory itself; hence, the importance of learning experiences from community participation-based bio-learning. The bio-learning community is recognized as supported by community training processes in, from, and for life. It takes the indigenous, cultural, customs, what is shared from the territory, and what has been referred to as the community spirit of bio-learning as its starting point.
Downloads
References
Assmann, H. (2002). Placer y ternura en la educación. Hacia una sociedad aprendiente. Ediciones Madrid.
Bolaños, J. (2021). Programas educativos dirigidos a poblaciones de los territorios rurales. experiencias en Argentina y México. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 37, 7-17. https://Dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7701594
Bonilla, E. y Rodríguez, P. (2005). Más allá del dilema de los métodos. Norma.
Contreras, D. y Pérez, L. (2010). Investigar la experiencia educativa. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 19(62), 885-892 . https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14031461011
Escobar, A. (2014). Sentipensar con la tierra: nuevas lecturas sobre desarrollo, territorio y diferencia. UNAULA. https://journals.openedition.org/amerika/7918
Funke O. y Ayob, S. (2020). The Utilisation of Translanguaging for Learning and Teaching in Multilingual Primary Classrooms. Multilingua, 41(1), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0072
Glaser, B. G. y Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Gómez, E. (2015). Aspectos teóricos de las nuevas ruralidades latinoamericanas. Gazeta de Antropología, 31(1), 1-15. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/36669
Gonzáles, A.B., Cortés, G.P. y Leite, M.A. (2020). Las aulas multigrado en el medio rural en Andalucía. Visiones docentes. Revista de investigación educativa de la Rediech, 11(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v11i0.860
Gutiérrez, F. (2010). Las nuevas ciencias de la vida. Polis, Revista de la Universidad Bolivariana, 9(25), 223-233. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/305/30512376012.pdf
Habermas, J. (1986). Ciencia y técnica como «ideología». Tecnos.
Kemmis, S., y McTaggart, R. (2013). La investigación – acción participativa. La acción comunicativa y la esfera pública. En: Yvonna, N., y Lincoln, Y. Estrategias de Investigación Cualitativa. Manual de Investigación Cualitativa. Volumen III. (pp.361- 439). Gedisa.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner. Doing critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Llambí, L., y Pérez, E. (2007). Nuevas ruralidades y viejos campesinismos. Agenda para una nueva sociología rural latinoamericana. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 4(59), 37-61. https://biblat.unam.mx/hevila/Cuadernosdedesarrollorural/2007/no59/2.pdf
López, R. L. R. (2006). Ruralidad y educación rural. Referentes para un programa de educación rural en la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Revista colombiana de educación, 2(51) 138-159. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/RCE/article/view/7687
Lozano, D. (2019). Calidad educativa y cumplimiento del derecho a la educación de la población rural colombiana. Revista de la Universidad de La Salle, (79), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.19052/ruls.vol1.iss79.3
Mate, D., Dos Santos, K., y Fornari, K. (2022). Práticas comunitárias e currículo educação do campo, das águas e florestas na Região Norte e Nordeste. Revista e- Curriculum, 20(1), 279-301. https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/curriculum/article/view/54892
Novoa, P. A y Camacho, S. C. (2017). Innovación y Comunitarización en la educación. Revista de la Universidad La Salle, 73(3) 13-31. https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/ruls/vol2017/iss73/1/
Ocaña, A. y Reyes-López, M.L. (2019).'My Favorite Song': Understanding a Music Learning Ecology of Children From Interaction Among Media, Family and School Contexts. British Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051719000081
Parra, L., Chaverra, L. y Castro, A. (2019). El bioaprendizaje: posibilidad para desplegar la condición de humanidad en los escenarios educativos. Intersticios: Revista sociológica de pensamiento crítico, 13(1), 191-199. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6885082
Pérez, E., y Cárdenas, E. (2020). De la educación rural a la educación rural comunitaria: reflexiones desde el municipio de San Jerónimo Coatlán, Oaxaca. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 1(1), 225-250.
Romero, J. (2012). Lo rural y la ruralidad en américa Latina: Categorías conceptuales en Debate. Psicoperspectivas, 11(1), 8-31. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/psicop/v11n1/art02.pdf
Salcedo, C. J. R. (2021). Educación y Afectos. Etnografía Afectiva para Reconocer la Subjetividad Campesina de la Vereda la Manga en Yopal (Casanare). Primera Edición. Ediciones Unisalle.
Takeuchi, M. A., Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M.C., Adams, J. D. & Hachem, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM Education: A Critical Review. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 213-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802
Torres, A. (2013). El retorno a la comunidad: problemas, debates y desafíos de vivir juntos. CINDE y EL BÚHO.
Vera, A. N.Y. (2019). Escuela rural y territorio: una construcción para la paz. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Educativos, 49(1), 293-314. https://rlee.ibero.mx/index.php/rlee/article/view/41
Woods, P. (1997). Experiencias críticas en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje (trad. de J. Bayo). Paidós.
Woods, P. (1998). Experiencias críticas en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Ediciones Paidós.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gloria-Carmen Tobón-Vásquez, INGRID YISED SUAREZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Once the manuscript is approved, the authors should file and sign the Right Transfer Format.
