Care Policies in Some Latin American Countries.

A Feminist Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v30.n54.2023.856

Keywords:

care policies, care economy, welfare state, latin america, family regime

Abstract

Objective: One of the objectives of this research was to highlight that in the Latin American region the dominant care regime is family-based, with women carrying the -household chores (in comparison to males). The role of public interventions is to facilitate
subsidies. Methodology: Discussing care policies leads to theorizing that has roots in Nordic countries and is
based on wellbeing theories, therefore its applicability to Latin America continues to be a topic of discussion.
This literature review is positioned from feminist theory – especially from care economy – by presenting authors
who question care policies from a standpoint of logic that goes beyond welfare theories and interconnects with feminism. Results: An analysis of care policies was carried out
based on the basic concepts proposed by the economist Shahra Razavi as the “care diamond,” understood as those institutions involved in providing care to populationmgroups that demand it. This meant providing an estimate of which institutions in Latin America provide most of the care. Conclusions: Strengthen the region’s health policies
by broadening their overall perspective is important, as well as understanding them as a collection of programs that cover everything from providing basic infrastructure and health measures to ensuring workers’ rights in the labor market, such as through maternity and paternity licenses among other measures. To ensure care as a component of human rights and the sustainability of human life, numerous collective actions must be taken.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brisolara, S. & Seigart, D. (2012). Feminist evaluation research. In S. N. Hesse- Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 290-312). SAGE.

CEPAL y Secretaría de Políticas para las Mujeres. (2010, 13 a 16 de julio). ¿Qué Estado para qué igualdad? XI Conferencia Regional sobre la Mujer de América Latina y el Caribe. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/16656/S1000327_es.pdf.

Cienfuegos, J. (2014). Tendencias familiares en América Latina: diferencias y entrelazamientos. Notas de Población, 41(99), 11-36. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/37632/np99011037_es.pdf ?sequene

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139-167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.

cgi?article=1052&context=uclf.

Elson, D. (2017). Recognize, Reduce, and Redistribute Unpaid Care Work: How to Close the Gender Gap. New Labor Forum, 26(2), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796017700135

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Political Economies of the Welfare State. International Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 92–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20630041

Esping‐Andersen, G. (2002). Towards the Good Society, Once Again? En G. Esping-Andersen (Ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State (pp. 1-25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256438.003.0001

Esquivel, V. (2011a). The Care Economy in Latin America: Putting Care at the Centre of the Agenda. “Undoing Knots: Innovating for Change”. United Nations Development Programme, Booklet No 2. PNUD.

Esquivel, V. (2011b). Sixteen Years after Beijing: What are the New Policy Agendas for Time-Use Data Collection? Feminist Economics, 17(4), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.616947

Esquivel, V. (2013). Care in households and communities. Background paper on

conceptual issues. Oxfam Research Reports. Oxfam. https://policy-practice.

oxfam.org/resources/care-in-households-and-communities-background-

paper-on-conceptual-issues-302287/.

Esquivel, V., Faur, E. y Jelin, E. (2012). Hacia la conceptualización del cuidado:

familia, mercado y Estado. En V. Esquivel, E. Faur y E. Jelin (Eds.), Las

lógicas del cuidado infantil. Entre las familias, el Estado y el mercado (pp.

-43). IDES.

Esquivel, V. y Kaufmann, A. (2017). Innovations in Care. New Concepts, New Actors, New Policies. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/13282.pdf.

Fisher, B. y Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. En E. K. Abel y M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives (pp. 36-54). SUNY Press.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) y International Labour Office (ILO). (2010). Gender imensions of Agricultural and Rural Employment: Differentiated Pathways out of Poverty: Status, Trends and Gaps. FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/i1638e/i1638e.pdf.

Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768512.

Folbre, N. (2008). Valuing children: Rethinking the economics of the family. Harvard University Press.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.

Harvard University Press.

López-Camacho, A. (2021). La liberación de la Madre Tierra: Más que la toma de un territorio. Ánfora, 28(51), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v28.n51.2021.783

Lugones, M. (2007). Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.

Martínez Franzoni, J. (2008). Welfare Regimes in Latin America: Capturing

Constellations of Markets, Families, and Policies. Latin American Politics and

Society, 50(2), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00013.x.

Martínez Franzoni, J. y Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2013). Can Latin American

Production Regimes Complement Universalistic Welfare Regimes?

Implications from the Costa Rican Case. Latin American Research Review,

(2), 148–173. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43670080.

Molinier, P. (2011). Antes que todo, el cuidado es un trabajo. En L. G. Arango

y P. Moliner (Eds.), El trabajo y la ética del cuidado (pp. 45-64). La Carreta Editores.

Naciones Unidas y CEPAL. (2016). Autonomía de las mujeres e igualdad en la agenda de desarrollo sostenible. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/40633/S1601248_es.pdf

Naciones Unidas y CEPAL. (2017). 40 años de agenda regional de género. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40333-40-anos-agenda-regional-genero.

ONU Mujeres. (2014) Declaración y plataforma de acción de Beijing. Declaración política y documentos resultados de Beijing+5 (obra original publicada en 1995). ONU Mujeres. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Headquarters/Attachments/Sections/CSW/BPA_S_Final_WEB.pdf.

Pérez-Bustos, T. (2018). El ethos del cuidado en la producción de conocimiento, una aproximación desde la antropología feminista al campo científico. En L. G. Arango Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T. Pérez-Bustos y J. Pineda Duque (Eds.), Género y cuidado: Teorías, escenarios y políticas (pp. 50-69). Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Universidad de los Andes.

Pérez-Bustos, T., Olarte, M. F. y Diaz del Castillo, A. (2014). Working with Care: Experiences of Invisible Women Scientist Practicing Forensic Genetics in Colombia. En E. Medina, I. Marques y C. Holmes (Eds.), Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, and Technology in Latin America (pp. 67-83). The MIT Press.

Ponte, B. y C. Nicole-Calderón. (2018). Los cuidados en América Latina y el Caribe. Textos seleccionados 2007-2018. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/44361-cuidados-america-latina-caribe-textos-seleccionados-2007-2018.

Pribble, J. (2006). Women and Welfare: The Politics of Coping with New Social Risks in Chile and Uruguay. Latin American Research Review, 41(2), 84–111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3874670.

Puyana Villamizar, Y. (2018) Entre el asistencialismo y los derechos de las mujeres: un análisis de la justicia de género del programa Más Familias en Acción en Colombia. En L. G. Arango Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T.

Pérez-Bustos y J. Pineda Duque (Eds.), Género y cuidado: Teorías, escenarios y políticas (pp. 253-272). Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Universidad de los Andes.

Razavi, S. (2007). The political and social economy of care in a development context: Conceptual issues, research questions and policy options. Programme on Gender

and Development, Paper No 3. UNRISD.

Razavi, S. (2016). The 2030 Agenda: Challenges of implementation to attain gender equality and women’s rights. Gender & Development, 24(1), 25-41.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1142229

Rico, M. y Robles, C. (2016). Políticas de cuidado en América Latina: Forjando la igualdad. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40628- politicas-cuidado-america-latina-forjando-la-igualdad.

Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2010). The Notion of “Rights” and the Paradoxes of Postcolonial Modernity. Indigenous Peoples and Women in Bolivia. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(2), 29-54.https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.18.2.29.

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

Care Policies in Some Latin American Countries. : A Feminist Perspective. (2023). ÁNFORA, 30(54), 136-160. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v30.n54.2023.856
Estadísticas
Resúmenes 640
Archivo 478
PDF 417
HTML 18