Encrypted Gender Ideology?

The Seminal Violence Underlying the Accusation

Abstract

Objective: the article addresses the accusation that gender ideology is a falsification of the true nature of human beings and society. The argument that this accusation, paradoxically, encrypts seminal violence in the socio-cultural base that prevents political subjectivism of diversity and as a result, it is incompatible with democratic politics. The exercise aims at understanding and supporting the demands and claims of diversity of gender -both of women and of the identities registered in the LGTBIQ community- against the naturalization, perpetuation and propagation of the encrypted violence in such accusation.

Methodology: based on the methodological presumptions of the decryption of power, that is, concealed instruments and strategies that maintain and catapult the political power achieved through the encryption of language. 

Result: it was evident that the discourse studied, paradoxically, encrypts a seminal violence incompatible with the democratic politics that impedes political subjectivism of the diversity of gender and propagates the violence experimented in the cultural, economic and political arenas.

Conclusion: the concept of gender-encrypted ideology must be rejected because it lacks political-conceptual rigor in the use of the category "ideology", moreover, it invalidates an important tool for diversity justice encoded in politics.