The experiential learning model as an alternative to improve the learning process within the classroom

Authors

  • Hedilberto Granados López Universidad Católica de Manizales UCM.
  • Claudia Lorena García Zuluaga Institución Educativa Santa María Goretti de Monte Negro Quindío

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v23.n41.2016.140

Keywords:

Learning, Model, Experience, Preference.

Abstract

Objective: to determine whether the prevalence of learning in fourth grade students from an educational institution is modified when implementing Kolb’s experiential learning model within the classroom.

Methodology: this quantitative approach was based on an exploratory design with a descriptive scope. The CHAEA-Junior Questionnaire was implemented to collect data.

Results: results showed an evident change in the prevalence of learning of the students who participated in this study. 

Conclusions: kolb´s experiential learning model (1984) is valid to determine that the learning preference of the individuals depends on their stimulus or their environment. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Hedilberto Granados López, Universidad Católica de Manizales UCM.
    Profesional en Filosofía. Profesor de la Universidad Católica de Manizales UCM.
  • Claudia Lorena García Zuluaga, Institución Educativa Santa María Goretti de Monte Negro Quindío

    Magister en Educación. Profesora de la Institución Educativa Santa María Goretti de Monte Negro Quindío.

References

Alonso, C. y Gallego, J. (1994). Estilos individuales de aprendizaje: implicaciones en la conducta vocacional. En F. Rivas (Ed.). Manual de Asesoramiento y orientación vocacional. Madrid: Síntesis

Butler, K. (1982). Learning and teaching style in theory and practice. Columbia: The learners Dimensions.

Claxton, C. S. y Ralston, Y. (1982). Learning styles. En C. S. Claxton y Y. Ralston (Eds.). Learning styles: their impact on teaching and administration. Washington: American Association for Higher Education.

Dunn, R, Dunn, K. y Price, G.E. (1979). The productivity environmental preference survey. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems

Keefe, J. W. (Ed.). (1982). Student learning styles and brain behavior: Programs, instrumentation, research. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36, 234-236.

Hernández, S.R, Fernández-Collado, C y Baptista, L. P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. México. D.F.: McGraw Hill. Interamericana.

Hunt, D.E. (1979). Learning style and student needs: An introduction to conceptual level. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.) Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 27-38). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals

Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Riechmann, S. W.; Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the validity of student learning styles instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87, 213-223.

Schmeck, R. R. (1981). Improving learning by improving thinking. Educational Leadership, 38, 384-385.

Smith, L. H. y Renzulli, J. S. (1984). Learning style preferences: A practical approach for teachers. Theory Into Practice, 23, 44-50.

Witkin, H. A. (1976). Cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher-student relations. In S. Messick & Associates (Eds.). Individuality in learning (pp. 38-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Downloads

Published

2016-12-14

How to Cite

The experiential learning model as an alternative to improve the learning process within the classroom. (2016). ÁNFORA, 23(41), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.30854/anf.v23.n41.2016.140